Sunday 6 December 2015

The Voyages of HMS Clio : Part II The South Pacific

The Voyages of HMS Clio
Part II - The South Pacific

HMS Clio, Commander Henry Douglas Wilkin DSO, arrived in Sydney on 9 May 1904 at the end of an eventful maiden voyage. She had to spend some time in the dockyard so it was just over a month after her arrival – on 15 June – that she set sail for a cruise through the South Sea Islands. The purpose of her voyage was to survey the various reefs in and around the Cook Islands and other groups and then to blast gaps in the coral reefs to make safe entrances for loading and discharging cargo.
And the term “a cruise through the South Sea Island” appears to have been as good as it sounds: Clio turned out to be quite a party girl! On the other hand, her luck with the weather was a repeat of her experience in the Bay of Biscay.
The first leg of her journey was to Noumea (18 June) in New Caledonia and then on to Suva, in Fiji where she arrived on 28 June. While at Suva, a survey of the harbour was made, noting changes in the position of buoys and beacons. Clio left Fiji on 5 July and two days later arrived at Nukualofa, Tonga. Here she coaled and her commander and other officers paid a courtesy call on King George Tupou II, who returned the compliment and visited the ship.
Four days after arriving in Tonga, Clio set sail again for Niue, an isolated piece of land that Captain Cook had called Savage Island. Here attempts were made at blasting the reefs to improve landing at the island.
On 19 July, Clio had reached the Cook Islands and moored at the main island, Rarotonga, where they were royally entertained – or, according to the island correspondent of Otago Daily Times: “Since [Clio’s] arrival Rarotonga had indulged in a quite unusual round of gaiety.”
There had been an important island wedding, the bride being the adopted daughter of Queen Makea, and a feast was given to the white people as part of the festivities, including Clio’s commander and several other officers. On the following evening a ball was given by the Resident Commissioner, Lieutenant-Colonel Walter Gudgeon, and the Government officials to the officers of the Clio. It was declared “a great success, being attended by the leading European residents and Queen Makea and other Arikis of the island.”
The Otago Daily Times’s correspondent went on to report: “There have also been numerous very enjoyable tennis and cricket matches got up for their entertainment, while they in turn have given lunches and dinners on board.”
Lt-Col Gudgeon was to be a passenger on Clio during the next leg of her voyage, to the island of Mangaia, where he was to attend sittings of the Land Titles Court and the High Court. However, Clio’s main object of visiting Mangaia was to blow a channel through the reef near the village of Oneroa on the west side of the island. Poor weather with a high sea running made it impossible to complete the task and so, in order to avoid delay, Commander Wilkin decided to continue his voyage to Tahiti, promising to return in about a fortnight, when the weather hopefully would have improved.
In mid August, after about a fortnight at Papieté on Tahiti – where doubtless more entertainment had been provided by the French authorities – Clio headed back to the Cook Islands, but not before she had surveyed the position of buoys and beacons in the harbour at Papieté, which had recently been altered.
On the way back to Rarotonga, she called at the island of Atiu, where “she stopped for some hours and blew out a boat passage in the reef. She was unable to perform this same operation at Mangaia, owing to the weather being too bad, but she will try again at that place before finally leaving this group for New Zealand.”
Of course, once back in Rarotonga it was party time: “an entertainment was given to Captain Wilkin and his officers on the evening of the 19th at the Courthouse, inaugurated by a few local friends, and on Saturday evening, the 20th the ship’s company were invited ashore to spend the evening and have a good time, which they thoroughly did.”
Later, the Rarotonga correspondent of the Otago Daily Times reported: “Their stay of four days was referred to by one and all as having been of the very pleasantest. All hands contributed to make it so, and they were entertained at tennis, cricket, drives about the island, as well as evenings at various houses, and a ball in the courthouse, got up hurriedly, but none the less enjoyable for that.”
The poor weather continued to prevent Clio from blasting the reefs at Mangaia and at the island of Aitutaki and so she sailed south, through the Kermedec Islands to New Zealand.
Clio arrived in Auckland on 1 September. Over the next two months, she stayed in New Zealand waters, visiting, among other places, Tauranga, Gisborne, Napier and Wellington.
However, within 48 hours of her arrival in New Zealand, a few of her crew caused quite a stir.
On 3 September, under the headings: “Lively Scene in Queen street – Three bluejackets arrested” the New Zealand Herald reported: “Bluejackets from HMs Clio were in action in Queen-street last evening, and created a very lively scene for about half-an-hour. The disturbance arose through Constable Cummings remonstrating with one of the men-o’-warsmen, who was a bit boisterous, and resented the constable’s interference. A scuffle ensued, and the bluejacket was incited by about 15 of his comrades, as well as by some civilians. Two or three constables came to the aid of Constable Cummings, but for a while the bluejackets were in command of the situation. Constable Cummings received a hard blow on the right eye, causing a painful injury, and Constable Lipscombe, who was set upon by three or four of the sailors, had to protect himself by vigorous defensive tactics. Finally three bluejackets and a civilian were arrested and taken without more ado to the police cells. Dr Sharman attended to Constable Cumming’s wound.”
The next day at the Police Court, the three sailors were charged with various offences including using obscene language and assaulting and resisting the police. Naturally, they pleaded not guilty.
The men were reported to be “David Thomas Moffatt, George Kerracker and C W Lunn”, but the reporter did not get the names precisely right.
David Thomas Moffat, 24, from Liverpool, enlisted as a boy in 1896 while George McKerracher, 30, from Pembroke Dock, and Charles Wilfrid Lunn, 26, from Derby, both enlisted in 1901. Moffat was an able seaman, while the other two were stokers.
New Zealand Herald reported on the case:
“Constable Cummings who appears in the witness-box with a bandage over his right eye, said that the disturbance commence through three or four sailors creating a disturbance opposite His Majesty’s Arcade. Ultimately one of the sailors fell upon the footpath and two of his companions thereupon started pulling him about. Witness told them to go home, and the men started to go, but before they had gone very far the same man fell again. Witness proceeded to arrest him, and then Moffatt interfered with the result that the prisoner got away. Witness then turned his attention to Moffatt, who used obscene language and struck witness on the nose and kicked him of the shins. When Constable Lipscombe came up 10 minutes later he managed to secure his man.
“Moffatt, who declined to give evidence on oath, said that when the constable interfered with him he was only doing his best to get drunken companion down to the ship.
“After an officer of HMs Clio had stated that the accused would be punished on board by stoppage of leave and wages, the magistrate said it was a great pity that the sailors had misconducted themselves to such an extent, but, taking all the circumstances into consideration, and the fact that accused would be punished on board, he would only order him to come up for sentence when called upon.
“Kerracker and Lunn were similarly dealt with. It was shown that they went to Moffatt’s assistance when he was arrested. Kerracker assaulted Constable Cummings and Constable Lipscombe then too him in charge. Kerracker thereupon assaulted Lipscombe. Lunn was clearing off down the street when Constable Curtin barred the way and threw him. In the struggle which ensued Lunn kicked the constable on the back and the legs, thereby laming him.”
The three men’s service records are interesting in that there is no indication of any significant punishment for McKerracher or Lunn. There is a note of “cells 10 days” against the year 1904 on Moffat’s record, but that could have been for some other offence – it wasn’t the first time he had been in trouble. However, the annual character review of each man for that year was VG [very good] and both McKerracher and Lunn were promoted to stoker 1st class before the end of their service on Clio.
More decorum was neccessary during the rest of Clio’s stay in Auckland. First, there was the arrival two days after Clio of the French cruiser Protet commanded by Commandant Paul Adigard who was Chef de la Division navale de l'Océan Pacifique, and was addressed as Commodore.
But Commodore Adigard was not a happy bunny.
At the time, there was a law – a provision in the Defence Act of New Zealand – which required the permission of the Governor to be obtained before the crews of foreign warships could land in the colony. Usually, when a Consular representative in Auckland expected a warship belonging to his country, he would obtain the necessary landing permit beforehand, but this hadn’t happened this time, so when the Auckland harbourmaster told the Commodore, he became almost apoplectic.
He declared that no such absurd law existed in any other part of the world, and that so long as it was in force no French warship would visit New Zealand and he would cable to his Government on the matter.
Of course, there was no difficulty in obtaining the Governor’s permit to land. According to the Auckland Star: “It came promptly in the most courteous form, the Premier telegraphing M Boeufve, French Consul in Auckland, extending on behalf of His Excellency and himself a cordial welcome to Commodore Adigard and his officers and crew. This telegram was presented to the Commodore by the Consul yesterday morning, but in the meantime the position had become somewhat strained, and the Commodore did not seem disposed to recede from the stand he had taken.”
The Consul maintained a diplomatic silence about the whole matter. An Auckland Star reporter noted: “He said that he preferred to say nothing on the matter at present, and merely promised a statement when it was cleared up – perhaps within a week or so. It was understood that the matter was being referred to the authorities.”
It was only a few months before – in May – that Robert Boeufve had become Consul and it would appear that Protet was the first French warship to visit New Zealand since he had been appointed, so he may not have known the procedure.
But it was the most junior actor in the saga – the harbourmaster – who was the one who got it in the neck and was told that in future he should limit himself to pointing out the warship’s anchorage.
Clio’s Commander Wilkin, as captain of one of the two Royal Navy vessels in port – the other was Commander Cunningham Robert de Clare Foot of HMS Psyche, had to work hard to smooth the Gallic temperament. And this, of course, meant entertaining.
There was a private dinner on board Protet one evening which the two officers attended, another on board Clio, which Commander Wilkin hosted, and several dinners and receptions at the homes of prominent residents.
Other members of the crew were also involved in event on land in Auckland. There was a triangular shooting match between teams representing HMS Clio, the Auckland Engineers, and the No 3 Native Rifles at the Mount Eden Rifle Range one afternoon. The eight-man team from Clio got the highest aggregate – 401 points.
On another evening, a sailor from Clio called “Mr Fred Moore” took on Mourzouk, an Algerian professional wrestler in Jack Carkeek’s troupe, in a contest at His Majesty’s Theatre. Mourzouk won in two and a half minutes.
On 8 October, Clio left Auckland and sailed along the East Coast for Wellington. First stop was Tauranga were several parties of crew were landed to play a football match against a local side (Clio won 3-0) and a rifle match against Tauranga Mounted Rifles (Clio lost by six points). The Clio resumed her voyage the next day via Gisborne towards Wellington.
As she was in the Cook Straits between North and South Islands, Clio had another encounter with the forces of Nature and – as on her maiden voyage – sustained some damage.
The gales which swept over New Zealand that month were some of the strongest and destructive experienced for some time. More than one ship either ran aground or was severely damage. Lieutenant Arthur Payne on HMS Tauranga was swept overboard and drowned. 
Clio did not escape unharmed. She encountered the full force of the tempest in the Cook Straits. She was unable to enter the bay at Wellington, so stood way towards Cape Campbell. A mountainous sea was running and waves constantly broke over the ship, washing the stern boat out of the davits. This was carried away, and the sails, which were set to steady the vessel, were blown to ribbons.
While Clio was in Wellington news came that a body dressed in naval seaman’s clothes had been fished out of Auckland Harbour. The man was about 13½ stone, and 5ft 9in in height, with close-cropped dark brown hair. This description tallied with one given to the police by Commander Wilkin of a presumed deserter, Patrick Higgins, who had last been seen alive on the Railway Wharf on the evening of 7 October, the day before Clio had sailed. However, with Clio now so far away, the body could not be formally identified, and the inquest jury returned a verdict that it was an unknown man. The condition of the body indicated it had been in the water from two to three weeks, which also meant the cause of death could not be determined.
After ten days in Wellington, Clio made her way back to Auckland via Napier, Gisborne and Tauranga. Once in Auckland, the entertainment started again. The Governor, Lord Plunket, gave an official dinner in honour of the King’s Birthday on 9 November, and Commander Wilkin attended together Commander Willoughby Pusey Dawson, captain of the surveying vessel HMS Penguin, then in harbour.
A few days later there was a shooting match at the Mount Eden rifle range between teams representing Clio and Penguin, which Clio won.
Originally it was planned that Clio should spend Christmas in Sydney, but when she sailed from Auckland on 18 November, she had to head north to Fiji, where she stayed at the disposal of the new Governor, Everard Ferdinand im Thurn, because of political problems at Tonga. Besides being Governor of Fiji, a position he had only taken up on 11 October, Mr im Thurn had also been appointed High Commissioner for the Western Pacific, which included Tonga.
It had come to his notice that the finances of Tonga were in a mess and it was thought that two native ministers had been cooking the books. The High Commissioner sailed on Clio to Tonga to see for himself and after he arrived there on 8 December, he went to see King George Topou. He ordered his private secretary, Merton King, and the paymaster of Clio, Arnold H Gulliver, to audit the accounts in the presence of the Premier and the Treasurer who were being kept under guard drawn from Clio’s detachment of eight marines.
The auditors started on the Saturday after their arrival and finish on the following Tuesday. With the audit concluded, it was shown there were large deficits in the accounts. They found a hundred dollars in the safe but, according to the books, there should have been 5,000 dollars. There were also debts of 3,000 dollars to traders and others. The Premier, Siosateki Veikune and the Treasurer – both Tongan chiefs – were arrested, and deported to Fiji “for your good and the good of Tonga”, according to the High Commissioner. They were placed on board the Government dispatch boat SS Ranadi, under charge of a warrant officer and four seamen of the Clio and taken to Fiji.
Meanwhile, Clio stayed in Tonga while the High Commissioner tried to force King George into accepting a new Premier and Treasurer of his choosing. Eventually the agreed, after being given an ultimatum that he too would be deported and on 25 January 1905, Clio returned to Suva with the High Commissioner. A few days later, she left for Sydney arriving on 7 February. During the first 24 hours of the trip full-speed trials were made, and she achieved an average rate of between 14 and 14½ knots.
After just over a month Clio sailed from Sydney to join the fleet at Hobart in Tasmania where she was to spend another month before receiving orders to join the China Squadron in Hong Kong.
She sailed from Hobart on 13 April and after a few days in Sydney, departed the South Seas for China.



Clio - sources

The Voyages of HMS Clio
A note on sources


While not “literally impossible” to track Clio’s every movement, it would be extremely difficult – and expensive! The only way to do it would be to look at each page of all her log books – and on a page-a-day basis for a ship that was in her seventeenth year in service when she was eventually scrapped, that would be in the order of 6,000 pages! Pea-Bee has not the time, opportunity and not even the inclination, to sit at Kew in the National Archives, reading each page. And getting them copied at £1.30 a page….!
However, much of Clio’s service was noted in newspapers of the time which published Admiralty notices of ship movements. These were far from complete at the time of publication – and the on-line digital libraries do not always pick up all the entries that were published. Poor print quality, contemporary typos, flecks in the paper, squashed insects … all can fox optical character recognition programs so the search engines miss relevant references.
Pea-Bee has put together what has been found in five on-line archives:
·      National Library of Australia’s Trove (trove.nla.gov.au) (mainly The Sydney Morning Herald)
·      National Library of New Zealand’s Paperspast (paperspast.natlib.govt.nz) (mainly New Zealand Herald)
·      National Library Board Singapore’s NewpaperSG (eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers) (mainly The Straits Times)
·      Hong Kong Public Libraries’ Multimedia Information System: Old HK Newspapers (mmis.hkpl.gov.hk/old-hk-collection) (Hong Kong Telegraph)
·      British Library’s British Newspaper Archive (britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk) via findmypast.co.uk (mainly Portsmouth Evening News)
The newspapers have an advantage over any log book in that, when Clio was involved in any special event, the newspapers could go into the background and what was happening around Clio.
There is a series of log books available on line at oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com (via naval-history.net). These cover most of the period from the beginning of October 1913 until the end of May 1920, with only a few months omitted when Clio was “resting” at the end of 1918.
For anyone really interested in a particular timespan, a list of log books and the National Archive reference number is given here.


ADM 53/18662 19 Jan 1904-6 Jan 1905
ADM 53/18663 7 Jan 1905-27 Dec 1905
ADM 53/18664 28 Dec 1905-31 July 1906
ADM 53/18665 31 July 1906-20 July 1907
ADM 53/18666 21 July 1907-23 Sep 1908
ADM 53/18667 23 Sep 1908-27 Feb 1910
ADM 53/18668 28 Feb 1910-10 Oct 1910
ADM 53/18669 10 Oct 1910-30 Sep 1911
ADM 53/18670 1 Oct 1911-16 Oct 1912
ADM 53/18671 16 Oct 1912 – 5 Oct 1913
ADM 53/38067 6 Oct 1913-21 Nov 1914
ADM 53/38068 22 Nov 1914-31 May 1915
ADM 53/38069 1 June 1915-31 July 1916
ADM 53/38070 1 Aug 1916-30 Sep 1917
ADM 53/38071 1 Oct 1917-31 Oct 1917
ADM 53/38072 1 Nov 1917-30 Nov 1917
ADM 53/38073 1 Dec 1917-31 Dec 1917
ADM 53/38074 1 Jan 1918-31 Jan 1918
ADM 53/38075 1 Feb 1918-28 Feb 1918
ADM 53/38076 1 Mch 1918-31 Mch 1918
ADM 53/38077 1 Apr 1918-30 Apr 1918
ADM 53/38078 1 May 1918-31 May 1918
ADM 53/38079 1 June 1918-30 June 1918
ADM 53/38080 1 July 1918-31 July 1918
ADM 53/38081 1 Aug 1918-27 Aug 1918
ADM 53/38082 1 Mch 1919-31 Mch 1919
ADM 53/38083 1 Apr 1919-30 Apr 1919
ADM 53/38084 1 May 1919-31 May 1919
ADM 53/38085 1 June 1919-30 June 1919
ADM 53/38086 1 July 1919-31 July 1919
ADM 53/38087 1 Aug 1919-29 Aug 1919
ADM 53/69604 4 Nov 1919-31 Dec 1919
ADM 53/38088 1 Jan 1920-31 Jan 1920
ADM 53/38089 1 Feb 1920-29 Feb 1920
ADM 53/38090 1 Mch 1920-31 Mch 1920
ADM 53/38091 1 Apr 1920-30 Apr 1920
ADM 53/38092 1 May 1920-31 May 1920










Thursday 19 November 2015

HMS Clio - Her Maiden Voyage

The Voyages of HMS Clio

Pea-Bee’s interest in HMS Clio was sparked by two newspaper cuttings, yellowed with age and neither more than seven lines long, found among the memorabilia hoarded by Grandmother.



The cuttings posed so many questions: Why keep them? What was Clio to her? And what was the story these cuttings hinted at? In setting out to answer these questions, Pea-Bee started turning up more and more about HMS Clio and so this blog was born.

Before the story is allowed to unfold, however, it must be pointed out that at the beginning of the 20th century, rather confusingly, there were two ships in the Royal Navy called Clio. The older one, a wooden screw corvette launched in 1858, had, since 1877, been moored in the Menai Strait off Bangor, where she was used as a training ship for boys. Many hundreds of boys passed through her over her 40-odd years as a school – and Pea-Bee apologises to any of their descendants who have come to this blog hoping to find out more about life aboard her.

This blog is about the other Clio – a Cadmus-class sloop launched in 1903 and sold in 1920.

Clio was a small ship – the complement of officers and men was usually about 120 – but she certainly had an eventful career, and frequently she had to battle the elements: that typhoon reported in the cuttings was not the only storm she had to weather.
Clio’s life with the Service can be divided into five distinct phases:
1.       Her maiden voyage at the beginning of 1904
2.       Nearly a year on the Australia station, mainly cruising the islands of the South Pacific
3.       Ten years on the China Station, protecting British interests along the coast and in the lower reaches of the Yangtze
4.       Four years in the Middle East as part of the campaign against the Turks in Arabia during the First World War.
5.       Having been paid off towards the end of the war and put into the Reserve, Clio was recommissioned for one last adventure – the campaign against “The Mad Mullah” in Somalia – before she was sold for scrap in November 1920.

But first, the technical bit
Clio was the fifth of six Cadmus-class sloops built at the beginning of the 20th century. She took just over a year to build: her keel was laid down at Sheerness dockyard on 11 March 1902 and she was launched on 14 March 1903.
The Cadmus class sloops were built of copper-sheathed steel and each had both a steam engine and a full rig of sails. The engine was a three-cylinder vertical triple expansion steam engine developing 1,400hp and driving twin screws. The sail plan was barquentine-rigged, that is, three masts with a square-rigged foremast and fore-and-aft rigged main and mizzen masts. Clio could reach speeds in excess of 13 knots.
Each ship had six 4-inch/25-pounder and four 3-pounder quick-firing breach loaders together with three Maxim machine guns.
Clio had a length of 185ft, was 33ft at the beam and had a draught of 11¼ft. Overall, she had a displacement of 1,070 tons and carried 195-225 tons of coal.

The officers and crew
The size of the crew varied considerably. Most of the time the ship’s complement was between 110 and 120 officers and men, but for the Somaliland Campaign of 1919/1920, there were over 150 on board.
It would be extremely difficult – if not impossible – to produce a complete crew list for her 16 years of service. After her initial commissioning in 1904, Clio recommissioned six times – effectively six complete new crews to try to identify. Officers and warrant officers appeared in the Navy Lists of the time, and these will appear in a suitable appendix to this blog, as will the handful of other men who have been identified.
Clio was fitted with a hand capstan and hand wheel, situated after under the poop. As a result, the complement of the crew was allowed to include one musician for playing when weighing anchor or working cables. However, there does exist a photograph of Clio’s band and there are 14 men in view – including three members of the Royal Marine detachment on board. There was a bass drummer, two side drummers/buglers and 10 flute players, plus a drum major. How many were musicians by trade is not known but at least four, including the drum major, wore gunners’ badges.
At this point, all that is necessary is to give the dates of recommissioning and a chronology of the commanding officers.

19 January 1904 Sheerness                  Commander Henry Douglas Wilkin DSO
1 August 1906 Hong Kong                     Commander Cecil Dacre Staveley Raikes
24 September 1908 Hong Kong          Commander Charles Tuthill Borrett
12 October 1910 Hong Kong                 Commander Henry Rawdon Veale (joined 30 September)
17 October 1912 Hong Kong                 Commander Colin MacKenzie DSO (joined 25 July)
4 April 1916 “abroad”                              Commander Arthur Welland Lowis (joined 26 January)
Paid off 27 August 1918 Port Said      [Lt RNR Charles Lennard (joined 7 September 1916)]
5 March 1919 Port Said                    Commander Harold Brisbane Bedwell
27 March 1919 Port Said                  Commander Vernon Stanhope Rashleigh
4 November 1919 Gibraltar                  Commander Charles Harold Jones DSO (joined 13 September)

Part I Clio’s maiden voyage
Clio’s career did not get off to a good start, even though her sea trials after commissioning were satisfactory. It was on her maiden voyage, which began on 29 January 1904, that things started to go wrong. She was heading for the Australian station and, as reported at the time:
“Very heavy weather conditions were experienced down the English Channel, and Clio proved herself to be anything but a good vessel in a seaway. She shipped large quantities of water, and being a ship of extremely light draught rolled and pitches severely. So roughly was she handled by the elements that her commander deemed it advisable on the day after sailing to run into Portland for shelter, and while there two of the ship’s company deserted. The stormy conditions having somewhat moderated the voyage was resumed on January 31, and Plymouth was reached the same afternoon. A few hours were spent at this port and Clio sailed the same evening.
“While steaming across the Bay of Biscay a terrific tempest was encountered, resulting in some amount of damage being done to the ship. No sooner had Clio lost sight of the Eddystone lighthouse than a violent gale sprang up. The tempest continued to rage with unabated fury during the whole of February 1 and 2. One of the ship’s dinghies which was hanging over the stern of the ship was dashed to atoms by the mountainous seas which were running at the time. The jib forward was washed away and a good deal of damage done aft. The mess deck forward was flooded to the extent of 2ft or 3ft, and the contents were floating from one side of the side to the other. Clio rolled and pitched heavily, and at intervals of every few minutes shipped gigantic seas. On February 3, after passing Finisterre, the conditions moderated, and Gibraltar was safely reached, much to the relief of the whole of the ship’s company, on February 5. The ship was coaled and departure was again taken on February 8 for Malta.”
But the voyage had only just begun. On leaving Gibraltar, Clio sustained further damage: one of the blades of the port propeller was bent. When she reached Malta on 11 February, Clio went into dry dock and the repairs delayed her until 18 February, when she resumed her journey, arriving at Post Said on 22 February. The coal bunkers having once more been replenished, the Clio entered the Canal on the following day, and anchored off Ismalia for the night. The next morning she arrived at Suez and set sail down the Red Sea on 25 February.
Just about the time Clio was sailing between Gibraltar and Malta, the Russo-Japanese war broke out.
“In the Red Sea Clio encountered a fleet of Russian warships, and those in command scanned the Clio with great suspicion. During the night one of the Russian destroyers, with all her lights extinguished, steamed within 50 yards of Clio, and followed her closely for about 10 minutes. No signals were made, and no communication of any kind took place. Eventually the Russians having evidently satisfied themselves that Clio belonged to Great Britain abandoned pursuit, and the destroyer which had shadowed her was soon lost to sight.”
 After her close encounter with the suspicious Russians, Clio continued her voyage past Aden and across the Indian Ocean without incident until…
“While in the Malacca Straits on the way to Singapore, Clio picked up a native canoe floating bottom upwards. There were no traces of life in the vicinity, but it was presumed that the disaster had overtaken some boating party. The canoe was secured, and has been brought on to Sydney…[where] its history created a good deal of interest.”
Clio arrived at Singapore on 26 March and after a few days relaxing set off again on 3 April.
“Early on the morning of Sunday, 10 April, Engine-room Artificer Andrew Mott died of appendicitis, and at 11 am that day he was buried at sea off Timor with naval honours.”
Andrew John Mott had been born in Chelsea on 5 September 1878 but his birth was not registered and his parents have not been identified.
On 11 April, Clio reached Thursday Island off the tip of Cape York, Queensland. She remained there until 19 April, during which time football matches were organised against some of the shore teams.
“Three of the ship’s company, a stoker and two boys, deserted the ship in one of the boats. An exhaustive search was made, and although the boat was eventually discovered no trace of the missing men could be found.”
Clio sailed without them but when she reached Cooktown, further down the Queenland coast on 23 April “orders were received from Vice-Admiral Fanshawe from Sydney to return to Thursday Island to arrest the three deserters, who had in the meantime been captured by the civil authorities. The Clio arrived for the second time at Thursday Island on April 28, and received the deserters on board the following day. She sailed on April 30 for Sydney direct, and a stop was made each night while coming through the Great Barrier Reef.”
On reaching Sydney on 9 May 1904, there was some good news reported: “Since leaving Gibraltar excellent weather conditions had prevailed.”
Clio was to replace HMS Sparrow (which had been taken out of commission) on the Australian station and upon arrival at Sydney moored in Farm Cove, just off Mrs Macquarie’s Chair.

Sources
Unlike other of Pea-Bee’s blogs, individual facts have not been referenced this time. That is because virtually everything appears in The Sydney Morning Herald of Tuesday 10 May 1904 (via trove.nla.gov.au)
Other sources are:
The Navy List (via Ancestry.com)
Naval Database (www.pbenyon.plus.com/18-1900/C/01006.html)
Naval-History.net (www.naval-history.net/OWShips-WW1-18-HMS_Clio3.htm)
Exeter Flotilla (www.exeterflotilla.org/history_misc/nav_customs/nc_customs.html)

Historical Photographs of China (hpc.vcea.net/Database/Images?ID=31207)

Sunday 13 September 2015

The "Rough Life" of Ellen Bathe (nee Hornsby)

“A very rough life”

This is the tale of a family who went through some desperate times. Much of the information has come from a few contemporary files containing detailed accounts of the events in these people’s lives. As each of these files is referred to several times, it was thought preferable not to give each reference a different number. Thus all references to these files are marked by standard library marks (* † § ¶ etc) while other references have been numbered


“Woman had very rough life” was the succinct comment made in 1911 by Arthur W Goldthorpe, Assistant Clerk for Settlements for Lewisham Poor Law Union*.
He was referring to Ellen Bathe, wife of James Bathe, when he was collecting evidence to show that the cost of James’s treatment at Bexley Asylum should be borne by Bromley Poor Law Union and not by Lewisham.
Goldthorpe’s comment was an understatement; Ellen Bathe had indeed had a very rough life, although it is doubtful if the clerk knew all the details:
·        She lost her father when she was aged six and, despite her mother remarrying, was sent to the Sailors’ Orphan School in Hampstead, away from her brother, sister and her half-siblings.
·        She became an unmarried mother at 20 and had to have her baby in Lewisham Union Workhouse (James was the father).
·        After she and James married, he deserted her on more than one occasion, yet she bore him nine children in all, of whom five died in infancy.
·        Over a period of 20 years, she was forced to seek parish relief in three different Poor Law Unions; she took her children into a workhouse six times in all.
·        Then James was found to be “of unsound mind” or, as Ellen put it, “not right in the head”.

The expression “not right in the head” was one Ellen used several times while giving her evidence to Goldthorpe. She also mentioned James’s attempted suicide in 1897, and his three short spells in prison.

* * *

Although sometimes styled Eleanor in later life, her name at birth was registered as Ellen Hornsby[1] and soon afterwards she was known as Ellen Eliza Hornsby. She was born in Gosport in 1866, the eldest child of Edward Wright Hornsby, a painter, and Ellen (nee Rogers) who had married on Christmas Day 1864[2]. At some point between 1868[3] and 1870[4], the family moved to Aldershot[5] where Edward died in 1872[6].
Three years later, her mother married George Would[7], a plasterer from Greenwich, and by 1880, the family were living in Lee, south east London[8]. In 1881, however, Ellen was a pupil at the Sailors’ Orphan School in Hampstead[9].

* * *
James Bathe was the youngest of five sons of William and Mary Bathe. He was born in Deptford on 5 September 1862 and baptised at St Paul, Deptford, on 19 October[10].
When he was 17 years old, he took a job as a railway porter earning 10 shillings a week, working for the London Brighton & South Coast Railway at Brockley. That was on 23 October 1879. On 15 January 1881, he was transferred from Brockley to London Bridge and his wages were increased to 14 shillings a week. A few weeks later, on 26 February, he was transferred again – to Queens Road Peckham – and his wages raised to 16 shillings, but by the end of the year he had left the railway company[11].

* * *
Ellen’s relationship with James had got off to a rocky start: on 12 April 1887 she had to be admitted to Lewisham workhouse[12] where a daughter was born on 20 June[13]. The child was registered and baptised as Winifred Bathe Hornsby so presumably James acknowledged parentage[14]. Mother and daughter left the workhouse on 11 July[15], but it was not until the following year that Ellen and James were married – on 18 September 1888 at the Church of the Ascension, Blackheath*.
After the marriage, the family was constantly on the move. From January 1890 to November 1891 they were in Bexley Heath*, Sutton-at-Hone[16] and Crayford*, during which time two more children were born – Mary Bathe in 1890[17] and James Edward Bathe in 1891[18]. By then, James’s trade was as a brass finisher, and there were several brass foundries in Dartford which would have been within easy reach of all three places[19].
By the end of 1892, the family was back in Deptford but was destitute. On 15 November, Ellen had to enter Greenwich Union Workhouse with her two youngest children[20]. The next day James joined them[21]. Despite two attempts to restart their lives, it was not until 29 December that they were discharged[22]. While they were in the workhouse, the youngest child – James Edward Bathe, who was just a year old – had to spend a week in the infirmary[23].
Winifred had been with her maternal uncle in Deptford in 1891[24] while the rest of the family were living in Sutton-at-Hone. When Ellen and her other children had to seek parish relief, Winifred was not with them – perhaps she was still with her uncle. On 13 March 1893, the family was living in Lee and Ellen had to take Winifred to Lewisham Infirmary[25]. Winifred died there on 21 March[26], when she was not quite six years old. She was buried at Lee Cemetery[27].
The family was still in Lee when another child – William Horace Charles Bathe – was born in July 1894*[28]. However, in the October of that year, when the oldest two children were admitted to Lucas Street School, their address was given as that of their Bathe grandparents – 45 Oscar Street, Deptford[29].
After the death of James’s parents (his mother died in 1894[30] and his father in 1896[31]), the family lived in various houses in the north Deptford area.
James was a joint executor of the will of his father William and when probate was proved on 16 April 1896, James’s address was given as 17 Czar Street[32]. However, when Patience Bathe was baptised on 2 July that year, the family’s address was given as 17 Trim Street[33]. There was another brass foundry in Deptford and it is possible this was where James found work – his father and older brothers had worked there several years before.
William Bathe’s will, written on 13 November 1895, bequeathed two clocks – one to a friend and one to a sister – but “as to all the residue of my property not hereinbefore disposed of I give devise and bequeath the same unto and equally between my son James Bathe and his wife Eleanor Bathe or such of them as shall survive me.”
The will opened with the bequest: “I give to my grandson William Bathe son of my son James Bathe the Presentation chair given me by the congregation of Saint John’s Church Lewisham High Road after forty years’ service.”
James and Ellen did not inherit a lot of money: the gross value of the whole estate was just £57 19s 6d.
Patience Bathe, born in the summer of 1896, died before the end of the year[34] and the following summer James tried to commit suicide. He was treated first in the Miller Hospital, then in the lunatic ward at Greenwich Union Infirmary, before spending a week in jail (attempted suicide was a crime) and finally, on 18 October, after another three weeks on the lunatic ward, was released on a magistrate’s order to the care of his wife. Ellen’s address at this time was 16 Edward Street[35].
A few months later, the family was in Lewisham, at 18 Court Hill Road, when the two boys were registered at Hither Green School[36] and Mary at Lewisham Bridge School[37].
The following summer, 1898, James deserted Ellen and the three surviving children, who then had to go into Lewisham Union Workhouse[38]. The Board of Guardians applied to the magistrates’ court as James was legally liable for Ellen and her infant children. James was unable to pay maintenance and was jailed for seven days†.
Ellen described this period when she wrote to Bromley Union Guardians about six years later†:
“My husband [is] a thoroug bad man. He has brought me to this place under false pretences. He belongs to Lewisham but he is afraid that the guardians will make him work hard there for they had to put him in prison for deserting me and 3 children and while he was in prison I found out he lived with another woman a widow and when he robbed her of all she was worth he came back to me and I forgave him thinking he would be better but he has been worse still… He has never been a father to my children for he spend the best part of his wages in drink and other women.”
Ellen and the children were in Lewisham Workhouse for just four days in 1898[39] and when they left they had to find a new home in Catford. Ellen was to have another child – Esther Margaret Bathe – early the next year[40] but, once again, the family became destitute and Ellen had to take the children – including the baby – back into the workhouse for six days in May 1899[41]. Later the same year, the baby Esther died[42].
At the beginning of 1900, Ellen and the surviving children were once again in the workhouse – but only for four days[43]. Soon afterwards, another baby – Eleanor – was born but she lived only a short while[44].
By then, James had become a general labourer, although sometimes he still gave his trade as brass finisher.
In 1901, James took the family into Bromley where they became caretakers for a firm of Bromley estate agents, Baker Payne & Lepper*, although it would appear that it was Ellen who looked after the properties while James became a house painter. Over the next ten years they lived in a number of different houses in Bromley, Chislehurst and St Mary Cray.

The Old Bakery, Chislehurst, with coach house on right - Photo courtesy of Abigail Aish

Ellen gave birth to yet another child – on 1 May 1902, so the baby was named May – in Chislehurst[45] but a few months later – on 4 August – James was involved in a fracas and jailed for assault[46].
He had had an argument with Stanley Mitchell, the 22-year-old son of his landlord, James Mitchell, who was also the village baker. Under the headline “Chislehurst Shopkeeper Assaulted”, a newspaper report of the time states[47]:
James Bathe, the occupier of some rooms off High Street, Chislehurst, pleaded justification for assaulting Stanley Mitchell, shopkeeper, High Street, Chislehurst, on Monday evening. – Prosecutor stated that prisoner occupied some rooms over his coachhouse, and as his conduct on Bank Holiday night occasioned annoyance to people in the shop prosecutor spoke to him, and in return received some threats, followed by two blows in the face. – A witness who was in the shop corroborated. – Prisoner admitted the assault, and was fined 10s. and costs, or seven days’.

The Mitchell family c 1902 with, circled in the back row, Stanley Mitchell who was assaulted by James Bathe, and circled seated, James Mitchell, the landlord
Photo courtesy of Abigail Aish
The costs were 5s 6d and clearly James did not pay as he spent seven days in prison and Ellen had to take the children into Bromley Union Workhouse at Locksbottom◊.

James was beginning to show signs of mental problems and on 20 November 1903, he was admitted to the Locksbottom Workhouse Infirmary◊. The records seem to indicate that Ellen was admitted to the infirmary as well while the four children went into the workhouse itself. However, the admissions entry may have been wrong regarding Ellen – the entry already had one error: it gave her name as Mary.
In her evidence to Goldthorpe in 1911, Ellen said that while he was in Locksbottom Infirmary, James was diagnosed with “an abscess on the brain”*. However, his case notes when at Barming Heath Lunatic Asylum at the end of 1911 recorded that he had had the abscess on the brain since childhood and that it originated from measles§.

Ellen and the two girls left the workhouse at Locksbottom on 2 February 1904 – presumably Ellen was looking for work, but had to return that evening◊.
In June, there was some correspondence between Ellen and the Guardians and between James and the Matron. It would appear that Ellen wanted to take the children to a farm in St Mary Cray, but James wanted the family to stay in the Workhouse.
Some of Ellen’s letter has already been quoted, but it is worth repeating it in full† [Pea-Bee’s note: the letters have been punctuated to make them more intelligible but the spelling is as written]

Farnborough Kent
Dear Sir
I am writing to you in respect to a man named Bathe an inmate of the Union. He is my husband but a thoroug bad man. He has brought me to this place under false pretences. He belongs to Lewisham but he is afraid that the guardians will make him work hard there for they had to put him in prison for deserting me and 3 children and while he was in prison I found out he lived with another woman a widow and when he robbed her of all she was worth he came back to me and I forgave him thinking he would be better but he has been worse still.
He has been ill in Lewisham Union 3 times. We have only been in Bromley 3 years. He has never been a father to my children for he spend the best part of his wages in drink and other women. He has even tried to decoy a young woman in here to go out with him named Mary Saunders and I do not wish to live with him any longer.
I have asked him to go out and look for work but he says he has got hardened to the place and don’t care what becomes of us.
He has been in prison for knocking my Landlord son about and got us turned out of doors in Bromley so I am going to see the magistrate this morning.
He has detained my children from coming with me to try and get a little home together again. If I do not succede I shall come before you tomorrow to ask you for my children. I have got good characters to shew you I have worked for all my children.
The master & matron persuade him to stop because he is painting thire apartments. They give him tobacco and good food. He would never take me out they seem to take his part.
He sent me a note to go out and try and get some money off my lady were I have worked last Monday. He wanted to take me to a lodging house for 2 nights and get my neighbours to mind the children but I got work instead and that is why he is upset.
I hope I shall meet with your favour from Yours Humbly, Mrs Bathe

James’s response to this was¶:

Mr Bathe respectfully to the Matron
Madam
I beg that you will pardon the liberty I have taken of writing to humbly ask your advice as to how I can act with regard My Wife’s proposal especially as I feel that my daughter Mary could not be in better hands as regards care and training. My Wife informs me that she intends discharging herself and the four children for Monday. She informed me that she had got work on a Farm at the Cray as also a home for the children on the farm I feel that this is a mistake and the home consists of a Shed with straw for sleeping. I have wrote to her on the matter failing to get a satisfactory reply. I lay the Matter before you as also my wife’s note to me. I had better state that I thought you would not let her take the children the word She means you in her reply, as I am strongly against my children being brought to fruit picking and Farm work. I humbly ask as a parent that you will kindly help me in this matter. I feel quite quite upset at My Wife’s action and order the four children to remain here with me until I as their father can see better prospects open up for them and me, especially my youngest baby who I am dearly fond of I feel that out door life would soon compleete our case of trouble trusting you will kindly help me in this matter
I am, Dear Madam, Yours obediently, Mr J Bathe, Inmate

Ellen discharged herself on Monday 13 June 1904◊. The next day, all four children were discharged to her care◊. Two days later, James discharged himself◊, but did not, it would appear, join his family.
In his report of 1911, Goldthorpe wrote that “on his leaving the Workhouse he did not rejoin his wife and family outside but went away for 9 months”*. Goldthorpe noted that it was possible that James was again cohabiting with another woman.
When he eventually returned to the family, Ellen took James back yet again, and on 11 September 1906, their ninth child – Elsie – was born at 3 Beech Tree Row, St Mary Cray[48]. James was then described as a journeyman house painter. Like so many of their other children, Elsie died in infancy, in 1907[49].

* * *

On 3 July 1911, James “was found wandering at Brockley by Police” on the day “he had run way from home after being in bed, queer, a week. Was undoubtedly wrong in his head & has been for many years,” according to Goldthorpe’s report*. The Police took him to Lewisham Infirmary where he was detained for 14 days for assessment before being sent to Bexley Asylum‡.
Lawson Elder, PC CID, of Brockley Road Police Station said‡: “He was found wandering in Brockley Road with his coat off. He was very excited and stated that two men were following him with long knives to kill him. He could not give any account of himself. He appeared quite lost. He mumbled continually and was in a very weak state of health.”

When Goldthorpe questioned Ellen about where the family had lived – specifically to find out where James was in the years prior to his admission to the lunatic asylum – she was “rather hazy”.
It was from the family home at 26 Nichol Lane, Bromley, that James had wandered, and they had been there since at least the previous April when the census was taken[50], and Ellen gave a figure of six months (ie since January) for Goldthorpe’s report form*.
Their eldest daughter, Mary, had got married at the summer of 1910[51] and she and her husband went to live at 18 Nichol Lane about the same time[52].
Before Nichol Lane the family had been “18 months” at 8A Howard Road, Bromley, taking the dating back to Summer 1909.
Ellen said their previous home had been 2 Addison Road, Bromley Common, where they had “half a house under the Jarrads”, a family that later moved to Barming. The Bathe family were there for “2 or 3 years” bringing the dating back to 1906 or 1907. Certainly Ellen was in St Mary Cray in 1906 when Elsie was born.
Ellen was particularly “hazy as to dates” when it came to their homes before Addison Road. Goldthorpe believed that it was from Addison Road that the family had entered the workhouse, but that was several years earlier – and there was also the nine months gap during James’s desertion of his family.
Earlier, they had been “not long” at a house called Ferndale, in Cobden Road, Farnborough, but before that, Ellen said, they had been caretakers for Baxter Payne & Lepper “for about 10 years” including over a year at Abbey Lodge, Lubbock Road, Chislehurst and before that a period at Bromley House, Broadway, Bromley. That appears to be all she could remember, and Goldthorpe noted she was “mixed up here” and he would see if a list of addresses had been kept by BPL. Unfortunately the firm did not keep lists of caretakers and the clerk who would have had dealings with the Bathe family had left the firm and nobody currently working there knew anything about them*.
Some clue as to the Bathe’s work for BPL can be gained from the history of Abbey Lodge. This five-storey mansion had been occupied by Colonel Hugh Adams Silver but the family had moved away in 1903 and it seems the house lay vacant for many years[53].
Before then, at the time of the 1901 census, the family were at 82 Beckenham Lane, Bromley[54].

* * *
After James was assessed as being of unsound mind on 5 July 1911‡, he remained at Lewisham Infirmary until 18 July when he was admitted to the London County Asylum at Bexley Heath, where his niece, Ada Esther Bathe, was also a patient[55].
In August it was decided that the cost of his care should be paid for by Bromley Poor Law Union rather than Lewisham* and on 7 October, he was transferred to the Kent County Asylum at Barming Heath‡. His case notes begin by noting: “Mother, aunt & nieces insane”.

Ø  James’s mother was suffering from aphasia – that is, had problems with speaking and understanding other people – when she died, aged 72[56]. Any damage to the language areas of the brain can result in aphasia, including strokes, trauma, tumours and dementia. Her death was certified by the local GP, Dr Alfred Kirby. He gave the death as aphasia and senectus, or old age, a catch-all description which some doctors used because, although they believed there may have been some underlying condition, the patient was too frail for further investigation.
Ø  James’s niece Ada Bathe was first declared insane on 28 February 1902[57]. She was excited, restless, inclined to be hysterical, and saw visions. She was sent to the London County Asylum at Cane Hill but was later discharged. She was certified again in 1904[58] and again on 28 January 1905[59] after which she was confined at Bexley Heath until her death in 1918[60]. Her symptoms would suggest that she was suffering from schizophrenia. 
Ø  As to the aunt and any other nieces, nothing is known: there were four paternal aunts, three maternal aunts and five other nieces – but there is no evidence that any of them suffered insanity.

James’s case notes§ continued by saying he had had painter’s colic and venereal disease. “Painter’s colic”, a form of chronic lead poisoning, could produce short-term memory loss, depression, nausea, abdominal pain, loss of coordination, and numbness and tingling in the extremities as well as fatigue, problems with sleep, headaches, stupor, slurred speech, and anaemia.
However, his mental problems were more likely to have been associated with the abscess on his brain that he had had since childhood, as the result of an attack of measles. The measles virus can give rise to various conditions of the brain, including, for example, encephalitis, which in turn can also lead to memory loss, epilepsy, personality and behavioural changes, problems with attention, concentration, planning and problem solving, and fatigue.

James’s mental state when he arrived at Barming Heath in October 1911 was assessed by Norman Walters Stevens, a young medical officer at the Asylum. He said§: “Patient talks sensibly & answers questions put to him readily & well. Tells me he was taken to Bexley Heath Asylum, because he was found wandering about in a dazed condition by the Police. They afterwards told him that he said that two men were following him with long knives. He attributed this confused state to worry from being out of work & want of food. Says that he has not had a fit since he was admitted into Bexley Heath Asylum. He has not had a fit since he was admitted here. He is very civil & polite.”
James continued to be quiet, sensible and well behaved and, from early December, was allowed out of the Asylum to work. On 5 January, he left the Asylum on trial and a month later was discharged “recovered”§.

* * *
It is not known whether he returned to Ellen immediately on his discharge from Barming Heath, but in the electoral rolls for 1918 and 1919, James and Ellen were at 18 Dacre Street, Lee – their son William was still in the army and appeared at that address as an absent voter[61].
It would seem, however, that about this time, Ellen eventually gave up on James and left him for good. From 1921 until his death in 1933, James was a lodger at a house at 23 St John’s Road, Deptford, renting from a widow called Charlotte Millman[62]. While it is not clear where Ellen was initially, by 1931 she was living in Walthamstow[63] with her daughter May and her husband Reginald Peacham who she had married in 1925 in Lewisham[64].
James died, aged 68, in the Greenwich Workhouse on Woolwich Road on 30 January 1933, although his residence was given as 23 St John’s Road. He was described as a retired cable hand. The cause of death was certified as myocardial failure and arteriosclerosis[65].

In 1931[66], Ellen sailed to Canada to visit her other daughter, Mary. Ellen stayed in Canada for six or seven weeks and on her return took up residence again with May and Reginald Peacham, initially in Finchley and later in Edmonton until about 1936[67].
The Peachams then moved down to Hollington, near Hastings[68] – where Reginald originally came from – and it is believed Ellen went with them. She was buried at St Leonard’s, Hollington, on 11 June 1939[69], although her death was registered in Walsingham, Norfolk[70].

* * *
Of James and Ellen’s children who reached adulthood;
Ø  Mary married Alec Robert Ince in 1910[71] and had two sons before Alec emigrated to Canada in April 1914[72]. Mary sailed with the children to join him on 15 September 1914[73], but within days of their arrival the younger child died of phosphorus poisoning[74]. The couple had at least two more children in Canada[75].
Ø  James Edward Bathe married Margaret Alice Ledden (1893-1982) at the end of 1913[76]. During the First World War, James served with a motor transport unit of the Army Service Corps, reaching the rank of corporal[77], and after the war became a motor mechanic, running the Picton House Garage in Lee High Road from about 1922 until 1959[78]. He and Margaret had three children[79] and he died in 1972[80].
Ø  William Horace Charles Bathe also served in motor transport with the ASC during the war[81]. He married Lilian Davies (1897-1985) in 1920[82] and the couple had two children: the first, Christopher William J Bathe, was born in October 1920 but died a year later[83]. Their second child, Eva Marjorie Bathe, was born a few weeks after her brother died[84]. She was married in 1945 and died in 2002[85]. William died in the Brook Hospital on 13 April 1959[86].
Ø  May, who married Reginald Peacham (1900-1977), had two children[87] and died in Hastings in 1987[88].

References:
* London Metropolitan Archives: Lewisham Board of Guardians: Orders of Removal Outwards 1911. Ref: LEBG/183/31 (Ancestry images 314-328)
London Borough of Bromley Archives: Bromley Poor Law Union: In-letter Book, general. Ref: 846GBy/A/C/a/2/48
London Borough of Bromley Archives: Bromley Poor Law Union: In-letter Book, general. Ref: 846GBy/A/C/a/2/49
London Borough of Bromley Archives: Bromley Poor Law Union: Admissions & Discharges Ref: 846GBy/W/R/a/14 (for 1902) and 846GBy/W/R/a/15 (for 1903/4)
§ Kent County Archives: Barming Heath Asylum: Case Notes, 1910-1913. Ref: MH/Md2/Ap25/61
‡ Kent County Archives: Barming Heath Asylum: Reception Order. Ref: MH/Md2/Ap28/217







[1] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Alverstoke Q1 1866 Vol 2b p507 (via Ancestry.com)
[2] England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index, 1837-1915 Alverstoke Q4 1864 Vol 2b p872 (via Ancestry.com)
[3] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Alverstoke Q1 1868 Vol 2b p525 (via Ancestry.com)
[4] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Farnham Q3 1870 Vol 2a p101 (via Ancestry.com); Surrey History Centre, Anglican Parish Registers Ref: ALDM/3/3 (Ancestry.com Surrey, England, Baptisms, 1813-1912 Aldershot, St Michael the Archangel 1864-1872 image 43)
[5] 1871 England Census Class: RG10; Piece: 817; Folio: 47; Page: 27; GSU roll: 827758 (Ancestry.com 1871 England Census Hampshire>Aldershot>District 9 image 29)
[6] England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Farnham Q3 1872 Vol 2a p60 (via Ancestry.com); Surrey History Centre, Anglican Parish Registers Ref: ALDM/4/2 (Ancestry.com Surrey, England, Burials, 1813-1987 Aldershot, St Michael the Archangel 1870-1953 image 20)
[7] England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index, 1837-1915 Alverstoke Q1 1875 Vol 2b p684 (via Ancestry.com)
[8] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q2 1880 Vol 1d p1103 (via Ancestry.com); London Metropolitan Archives, Lewisham St Mary, Register of Baptism, P86/mry, Item 012 (Ancestry.com London Births & Baptisms 1813-1906, St Mary Lewisham 1880 image 10); 1881 England Census Class: RG11; Piece: 729; Folio: 111; Page: 20; GSU roll: 1341170 (Ancestry.com 1881 England Census London>Lewisham>Lee>District 5 image 22)
[9] 1881 England Census Class: RG11; Piece: 167; Folio: 64; Page: 16; GSU roll: 1341036 (Ancestry.com 1881 England Census London>St Johns Hampstead> District 7 image 17)
[10] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Greenwich Q4 1862 Vol 1d p573 (via Ancestry.com); London Metropolitan Archives, Deptford St Paul, Register of Baptism, p75/pau, Item 012 (Ancestry.com London Births & Baptisms 1813-1906, Lewisham, St Paul, Deptford 1862 image 32)
[11] Ancestry.com. UK, Railway Employment Records, 1833-1956 London Brighton & South Coast Railway, Traffic Appointments 1838-1884 Piece: 775 images 95, 233, 328
[12] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LeBG/198/26 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Lewisham High Street Workhouse 1886-1887 image 168)
[13] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LeBG/198/26 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Lewisham High Street Workhouse 1886-1887 image 210)
[14] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q3 1887 Vol 1d p1123 (via Ancestry.com); London Metropolitan Archives, Lewisham St Mary, Register of Baptism, p86/mry, Item 014 (Ancestry.com London Births & Baptisms 1813-1906, Lewisham, St Mary, 1887 image 12)
[15] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LeBG/198/26 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Lewisham High Street Workhouse 1886-1887 image 224)
[16] 1891 England Census Class: RG12; Piece: 641; Folio: 22; Page: 38; GSU roll: 6095751 (Ancestry.com 1891 England Census Kent>Sutton at Hone> District 11 image 39)
[17] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Dartford Q1 1890 Vol 2a p476 (via Ancestry.com)
[18] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Dartford Q4 1891 Vol 2a p461 (via Ancestry.com)
[19] 1899 Kelly’s Directory for Kent (via Ancestry.com image 828)
[20] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref GBG/250/23 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Greenwich>Greenwich>Workhouse (Institution) Woolwich Road 1892-1893 image 267)
[21] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref GBG/250/23 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Greenwich>Greenwich>Workhouse (Institution) Woolwich Road 1892-1893 image 267)
[22] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref GBG/250/23 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Greenwich>Greenwich>Workhouse (Institution) Woolwich Road 1892-1893 image 322)
[23] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref GBG/250/23 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Greenwich>Greenwich>Workhouse (Institution) Woolwich Road 1892-1893 images 282, 287)
[24] 1891 England Census Class: RG12; Piece: 495; Folio: 136; Page: 43; GSU roll: 6095605 (Ancestry.com 1891 England Census London>St Paul, Deptford> District 9 image 44)
[25] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LeBG/198/32 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham> Lewisham High Street Workhouse 1892-1893 image 136)
[26] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LeBG/198/32 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham> Lewisham High Street Workhouse 1892-1893 image 143); England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q1 1893 Vol 1d p774 (via Ancestry.com)
[27] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LEBG/201/001 Ancestry.com London, London Deaths and Burials 1813-1980 Lewisham>Lewisham>1893 image 1)
[28] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q3 1894 Vol 1d p1096 (via Ancestry.com)
[29] London Metropolitan Archives: School Admissions and Discharges 1840-1911 Ref LCC/EO/DIV06/LUC/AD/007 (Ancestry.com London School Admissions and Discharges, 1840-1911  Lewisham>Lucas Street School>Admission & Discharge Register for Infants image 75)
[30] England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Greenwich Q4 1894 Vol 1d p5568 (via Ancestry.com)
[31] England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Cricklade Q1 1896 Vol 5a p25 (via Ancestry.com)
[32] Principal Probate Registry: Calendar of the Grants of Probate and Letters of Administration made in the Probate Registries of the High Court of Justice in England (Ancestry.com England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966 1896>B>Ba image 54); Bathe private papers: Last Will of William Bathe 13 Nov 1895, probate grant 16 Apr 1896
[33] London Metropolitan Archives: Hatcham St James, Register of Baptism, p75/js1, Item 049 p2 (Ancestry.com London Births & Baptisms 1813-1906 Lewisham>St James, Hatcham>1896 image 10)
[34] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Greenwich Q3 1896 Vol 1d p1063; England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915  Greenwich Q4 1896 Vol 1d p584 (via Ancestry.com)
[35] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref GBG/220/027 and /028 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Greenwich> Greenwich > Admissions & Discharge> Hospital and Infirmary, Vanburgh Hill, SE10, 1897 images 109, 132, 141; 1897-8 image 11)
[36] London Metropolitan Archives: School Admissions and Discharges 1840-1911 Ref LCC/EO/DIV07/HIT/AD/010 (Ancestry.com London School Admissions and Discharges, 1840-1911  Lewisham>Hither Green School>Admission & Discharge Register for Infants image 1)
[37] London Metropolitan Archives: School Admissions and Discharges 1840-1911 Ref LCC/EO/DIV07/LEW/AD/003 (Ancestry.com London School Admissions and Discharges, 1840-1911  Lewisham>Lewisham Bridge School>Admission & Discharge Register for Girls image 19)
[38] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LEBG/198/39 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham> Lewisham > Admissions & Discharge> Lewisham High Street Workhouse, 1898-1899 image 114)
[39] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LEBG/198/39 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham> Lewisham > Admissions & Discharge> Lewisham High Street Workhouse, 1898-1899 image 117)
[40] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q2 1899 Vol 1d p1173 (via Ancestry.com)
[41] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LEBG/198/40 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham> Lewisham > Admissions & Discharge> Lewisham High Street Workhouse, 1899-1900 images 51, 53, 54, 56)
[42] England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q3 1899 Vol 1d p827 (via Ancestry.com)
[43] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LEBG/198/40 (Ancestry.com London, Workhouse Admission and Discharge Records, 1659-1930 Lewisham> Lewisham > Admissions & Discharge> Lewisham High Street Workhouse, 1899-1900 images 194, 196, 197)
[44] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q2 1900 Vol 1d p1149; England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Lewisham Q2 1900 Vol 1d p642 (via Ancestry.com)
[45] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Bromley Q2 1902 Vol 2a p526 (via Ancestry.com)
[46] London Borough of Bromley Archives: Register of Court 1, Bromley Magistrates’s Court, 5 August 1902 (ref 788/1/13)
[47] Bromley & District Times, 8 August 1902, p2
[48] England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Bromley Q4 1906 Vol 2a p540 (via Ancestry.com)
[49] England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Southwark Q3 1907 Vol 1d p14 (via Ancestry.com)
[50] 1911 England Census Class: RG14; Piece: 3633; Schedule Number: 239 (Ancestry.com 1911 England Census Kent>Bromley> District 4 image 484)
[51] England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index, 1837-1915 Bromley Q3 1910 Vol 2a p1155 (via Ancestry.com)
[52] 1911 England Census Class: RG14; Piece: 3633; Schedule Number: 222 (Ancestry.com 1911 England Census Kent>Bromley> District 4 image 450)
[53] www.bromleyfirstworldwar.org.uk/content/places/abbey-lodge-vad-hospital-chislehurst
[54] 1901 England Census Class: RG13; Piece: 682; Folio: 85; Page: 9 (Ancestry.com 1901 England Census Kent>Bromley> District 9 image 10)
[55] Lunacy Patients Admission Registers; Class: MH 94; Piece: 40 (Ancestry.com UK Lunacy Patients Admission Registers County Asylums and hospitals piece 40: 1905 image 40)
[56] England & Wales, FreeBMD Death Index, 1837-1915 Greenwich Q4 1894 Vol 1d p5568 (via Ancestry.com)
[57] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1898-1902; Ref: LEBG/196/008 p74 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1898-1902 image 88); London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1899-1905; Ref: LEBG/190 p48 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1899-1905 image 71); London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1900-1902; Reference Number: LEBG/193/012 p173 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1900-1902 image 206); London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1901-1905; Ref: LEBG/194/010 p40 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1901-1905 image 70)
[58] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1901-1905; Ref: LEBG/194/010 p158 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1901-1905 image 193)
[59] London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1901-1905; Ref: LEBG/194/010 p179 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1901-1905 image 214); London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians; Lunatics, 1899-1905; Ref: LEBG/190 p92 (Ancestry.com London Poor Law and Board of Guardians 1430-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham>Register of Lunatics 1899-1905 image 119)
[60] England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2007 Dartford Q3 1918 Vol 2a p681 (via Ancestry.com); Lunacy Patients Admission Registers; Class: MH 94; Piece: 40 (Ancestry.com UK Lunacy Patients Admission Registers County Asylums and hospitals piece 40: 1905 image 40)
[61] London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1918  Lewisham No 9 Polling District (I) Church Ward Div 1 ref LCC/PGR/B/1563 p17 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 Lewisham>Lewisham 1918 image 458); London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1919  Lewisham No 9 Polling District (I) Church Ward Div 1 ref LCC/PGR/B/1599 p17 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 Lewisham>Lewisham 1919 image 1507); London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1918  Lewisham No 9 Polling District (I) Church Ward Div 1 ref LCC/PGR/B/1563  p38 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 Lewisham>Lewisham 1918 image 479)
[62] London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1921 Chelsea & Deptford Polling District “H” South East Ward No 1 ref LCC/PGR/B/1667 p36 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 London>Chelsea and Deptford 1921 image 499)
[63] Board of Trade: Commercial and Statistical Department and successors: Outwards Passenger Lists. BT27 (Ancestry.com UK Outward Passengers 1880-1960 Southampton>1931>month 7 image 124)
[64] England & Wales, Marriage Index, 1916-2007 Lewisham Q3 1925 Vol 2a p681 (via Ancestry.com)
[65] England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2007 Greenwich Q1 1933 Vol 1d p1321 (via Ancestry.com)
[66] Board of Trade: Commercial and Statistical Department and successors: Outwards Passenger Lists. BT27 (Ancestry.com UK Outward Passengers 1880-1960 Southampton>1931>month 7 image 124); Library and Archives Canada: Passenger Lists (Ancestry.com Canadian Passenger Lists 1865-1935 Quebec>1931>month 7 image 421); Board of Trade: Commercial and Statistical Department and successors: Inwards Passenger Lists (Ancestry.com UK, Incoming Passenger Lists, 1878-1960 London>1931>month 9 image 23)
[67] London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1933 Finchley Polling District H Church Street Ward ref MR/PGR/C/0538 p6 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 Barnet>Finchley 1933 image 286)
[68] Hastings and St Leonards Observer 24 September 1938 (via findmypast.com)
[69] National Burial Index for England & Wales (via findmypast.com)
[70] England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2007 Walsingham Q1 1939 Vol 2b p160 (via Ancestry.com)
[71] England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index, 1837-1915 Bromley Q3 1910 Vol 2a p1155 (via Ancestry.com)
[72] Board of Trade: Commercial and Statistical Department and successors: Outwards Passenger Lists. BT27 (Ancestry.com UK Outward Passengers 1880-1960 Southampton>1914>month 4 image 3)
[73] Board of Trade: Commercial and Statistical Department and successors: Outwards Passenger Lists. BT27 (Ancestry.com UK Outward Passengers 1880-1960 London>1914>month 9 image 69)
[74] Archives of Ontario; Series: MS935; Reel: 195 p33 (Ancestry.com. Ontario, Canada, Deaths, 1869-1938 and Deaths Overseas, 1939-1947 York>1914 image 900)
[75] 1921 Census of Canada Ref: RG 31; Folder Number: 101; Census Place: York (Township), York South, Ontario; Page Number: 7 (Ancestry.com 1921 Census of Canada Ontario>York South>37 York (Township) image 8)
[76] England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index, 1837-1915 Bromley 1913 Q4 Vol 2a p1048 (via Ancestry.com)
[77] WWI Service Medal and Award Rolls; Class: WO 329; Piece Number: 2006 (Ancestry.com UK, WWI Service Medal and Award Rolls, 1914-1920 Royal Army Service Corps>Piece 2006 image 80)
[78] London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1922 Lewisham Polling District 9 (I) Church Ward ref LCC/PER/B/1700 p52 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 Lewisham>Lewisham 1922 image 359); London Metropolitan Archives: Electoral Registers 1922 Lewisham Polling District NC Blackheath &  Church Lee Ward ref LCC/PER/B/2695 p8 (Ancestry.com London, Electoral Registers, 1832-1965 Lewisham>Lewisham North 1959 image 25)
[79] England & Wales, Birth Index, 1837-1915 Bromley Q4 1914 Vol 2a p993; England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2007 Lewisham Q2 1918 Vol 1d p1491; England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2007 Lewisham Q2 1921 Vol 1d p2018 (via Ancestry.com)
[80] England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2007 Chelsea Q3 1972 Vol 5a p2002 (via Ancestry.com)
[81] WWI Service Medal and Award Rolls; Class: WO 329; Piece Number: 2001 (Ancestry.com UK, WWI Service Medal and Award Rolls, 1914-1920 Royal Army Service Corps>Piece 2001 image 278)
[82] England & Wales, Marriage Index, 1916-2005 Lewisham Q2 1920 Vol 1d p2473 (via Ancestry.com)
[83] England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2005 Lewisham Q4 1920 Vol 1d p2005; England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2005 Lewisham Q3 1921 Vol 1d p947(via Ancestry.com); London Metropolitan Archives: Board of Guardians records: Ref LeBG/206 Lewisham Infirmary Steward’s Death Register (Ancestry.com London, Deaths & Burials, 1659-1930 Lewisham>Lewisham> 1921 image 31)
[84] England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2005 Lewisham Q4 1921 Vol 1d p1855 (via Ancestry.com)
[85] England & Wales, Marriage Index, 1916-2005 Woolwich Q2 1945 Vol 1d p2012; England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2005 Ashford with Shepway Q4 2002 AS12B 5581B 81 (via Ancestry.com)
[86] England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2005 Greenwich Q2 1959 Vol 5c p453 (via Ancestry.com); Principal Probate Registry: Calendar of the Grants of Probate and Letters of Administration made in the Probate Registries of the High Court of Justice in England 1959 p226 (Ancestry.com England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966 1959>B>Ba image 114)
[87] England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2005 Lewisham Q3 1926 Vol 1d p1445; England & Wales, Birth Index, 1916-2005 Edmonton Q3 1933 Vol 3a p1042 (via Ancestry.com)
[88] England & Wales, Death Index, 1916-2005 Hastings & Rother Q1 1987 Vol 18 p1135 (via Ancestry.com)